Where a plaintiff claims he was distracted from an open and obvious danger and thus is still owed a duty of care by a landowner, the distraction must be a special circumstance that occurs at the particular place of the incident; not a commonplace occurrence or the distraction exception does not apply.The 1st District Appellate Court affirmed the decision of Cook County Circuit Judge William Edward Gomolinski.On Dec. 15, 2012, Daniel Peters was walking along a sidewalk when he “suddenly and without warning fell …