SPRINGFIELD — Most high court justices called it “sloppy” and said it “should not be repeated.”The lone dissenting justice labeled it “a complete breakdown.”Still, the Illinois Supreme Court today upheld the subpoena process that tied an already-incarcerated defendant to a bloody palm print left at the scene of his ex-girlfriend’s murder two decades ago.The man, Jerry Boston, had argued investigators should have gotten a warrant to get his prints, and a number of prosecutor …