Illinois law is murky on two issues presented by John Berthoud’s petition to revive the $1.4 million judgment he scored in 2003 against Randall Veselik.What was clear is that, as the Illinois Appellate Court explained in Department of Public Aid v. McGinnis, 268 Ill. App. 3d 123 (1994), “There are only two permissible defenses to a revival action: the denial of the existence of the judgment, or proof of satisfaction or discharge of the action, and these defenses must appear on the face of the record.”What …