Where a letter received by a consumer clearly indicated the identity of the current and original creditors of the consumer’s debt, it was not deceptive under Section 1692g(a)(2).The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a decision by U.S. District Judge Richard L. Young, Southern District of Indiana.Thomas Dennis owed a debt to Washington Mutual Bank. After he defaulted, LVNV Funding bought the debt. LVNV had Niagara Credit Solutions send a form debt collection letter on its behalf to Dennis. The letter included …