The financial disclosures that Christopher M. Sulyma received more than three years before he sued the investment committee and administrators of two Intel Corp. retirement plans for alleged breach of fiduciary duty under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 were sufficient to put him on notice of the ERISA violations, but he denied actually knowing about the alleged breaches until shortly before he sued, and the question for the U.S. Supreme Court when the defendants invoked the three-year statute of …