Illinois precedent supported the 5th District Appellate Court’s decision to reverse a judgment that okayed a contingency fee of $242,130 for Michael Baum under an agreement to split fees with Steven M. Johnson in personal injury cases against GlaxoSmithKline — because the lawyers failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 1.5 of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct — though it looks like Baum didn’t ask the 5th District to weigh the factors specified by Section 178 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts (1981 …