Affirming summary judgment for the defendants in a case where a hand surgeon’s claim for tortious interference with prospective economic advantage relied on Section 766B(b) of Restatement (Second) of Torts (1979), the Illinois Appellate Court noted that Section 18 of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Economic Harm (2020) — which reformulates the rule for interference with economic expectations — “does not include the language stated in subsection (b) of Section 766B.” Greene v. Passavant Memorial Area …