Criminal procedure — jurisdiction, mittimus question

Posted November 20, 2019 3:16 PM

Where a petitioner files a “motion to correct mittimus” that seeks to undo a judgment rather than correct a clerical error, the court should consider its content rather than its title in determining whether the motion is timely and whether the court, therefore, has jurisdiction over it.The 1st District Appellate Court affirmed the decision of Cook County Associate Judge Marc W. Martin.Refugio Blancas entered a guilty plea without negotiation to two counts of aggravated driving under the influence and two counts …

To Read the Full Story

Your source for legal news and information

Print & Digital Access

Stay in the know all year long with these benefits:

Delivery to your office in downtown Chicago or mailed outside our hand-delivery zone.
Unlimited access to chicagolawbulletin.com.
Access to our e-edition and mobile site.
Breaking news alerts, Morning Lineup and Afternoon Headlines.
Exclusive access to events, discounts and more.

Order now, or call 312-644-2394 or email Subscription@LawBulletinMedia.com for details.

Be in the know. These must-read insider briefings will keep you

informed of the latest legal developments in Chicago. Sign up today!

Criminal procedure — denial of sentencing credit

Where defendant petitions seeking sentencing credit and the petition is denied, the denial is not a final or appealable order and the appellate court lacks jurisdiction to consider it.
Family law — dissolution of marriage proceedings

Where a party in an ongoing dissolution of marriage proceedings is ordered to pay attorney fees for a related probate proceeding, that order is not final and appealable.
Sentencing — conspiracy

Where government could prove defendant joined smaller conspiracy than what was alleged in the indictment, conviction was affirmed.
Criminal law — void ab initio conviction

Where defendant pleads guilty due to the threat of being impeached by a prior conviction later found void ab initio and is sentenced based on the same conviction, he has suffered a constitutional violation.
Family law — adult disabled child support

Where a parent petitions for adult disabled child support, it may do so after the child has reached the age of majority if the child is not emancipated and the disability arose as a minor.
Civil procedure — remand

Where plaintiffs’ complaint contained one claim and multiple legal theories, defendants could not justify remand on the basis that one legal theory alleged violation of federal law.
Civil procedure — mootness

Where a petition for involuntary treatment is granted the petition may be reviewed even after the treatment has ended if it may recur or there is a public interest in settling the issue.
Civil procedure — standing

Where plaintiffs alleged economic harm based on theoretical risk of injury from potentially contaminated infant formula, theory was not sufficient to confer Article III standing.